Keep Cursor if you want AI help while editing code. Choose intentic when you want to assign tasks to agents, run them on chosen machines and review their work in a shared browser workspace.
You can also run Cursor's agent inside intentic. That keeps Cursor's account requirements; free workspace software does not turn a paid Cursor plan into free model usage.
Cursor vs intentic: at a glance
▸ marks Cursor's strengths (2 rows)
Both support agent-led coding · Both can run parallel work and provide code review. Cursor already has cloud execution, scheduling and customer-hosted workers. The useful distinction is editor-first work versus broader workspace and machine management.
| Dimension | intentic | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Main workflow | Assign tasks and review results in a browser | ▸Edit code with inline AI and IDE tools |
| Licence | MIT open-source workspace | Proprietary editor and service |
| Starting price | Free to self-host; AI/hosting separate | Limited free Hobby; Pro $20/month |
| Cloud work | Your always-on host or optional hosted machine | ▸Managed asynchronous cloud agents |
| Customer-hosted execution | Workspace and agent tools on your sandbox host | Self-hosted workers; agent loop and inference stay hosted |
| Automation | Schedules and connected-service events | Cursor Automate schedules and events |
The main differences
Editor replacement or agent workspace?
Cursor provides inline suggestions, chat and agent tools in an IDE. intentic does not replace those typing-time features. It manages supported agents, task environments, permissions and reviewed changes. Keep an editor alongside it when that suits your workflow.
Free software and Cursor pricing
Cursor has a limited free Hobby plan; Pro is $20/month and Teams is $40/user/month. AI allowances and overages depend on the plan and model. intentic is MIT-licensed and free to self-host; provider accounts and optional hosted machines are separate.
Self-hosting and local models
Cursor's self-hosted workers run tools on your hardware, but Cursor still runs the agent loop and inference. intentic lets you choose supported runtimes and their model backends. For local inference, use an agent that supports local models; it is not automatic for every agent.
Run Cursor's agent in intentic
Use your eligible Cursor account for agent turns in intentic, while keeping Cursor's editor for hands-on work. intentic adds its workspace, machine and review controls; it does not replace Cursor's licence or billing. Other supported agents can work alongside it.
When to choose Cursor
Pick Cursor if most of your day happens inside a code editor and inline suggestions matter. Its integrated IDE and managed cloud agents are real advantages. Adopting intentic makes more sense when coordinating tasks, providers and machines is the problem you need to solve.
Cursor: common questions
Is intentic a free, open-source Cursor alternative?
It is free MIT-licensed workspace software, but not a like-for-like editor replacement. Use it for agent-led coding and shared review. Running Cursor inside it still requires appropriate Cursor access; models and optional hosted compute can cost money.
What does Cursor cost?
Cursor offers a limited free Hobby tier, Pro at $20/month and Teams at $40/user/month. Other plans and metered usage are listed on its pricing page. Compare the included allowance, overages and cloud usage, not just the subscription price.
Can I use local models instead of Cursor's hosted models?
For a local-model agent workflow, compare OpenCode or Codex CLI configured with a supported local backend. intentic can manage supported agents around that workflow. Cursor's self-hosted worker feature is about tool execution, not running Cursor's inference locally.
Is Cursor fully self-hosted or offline?
No. Its customer-hosted workers send task data back to Cursor, which handles planning and inference. Privacy Mode is not an offline mode. With intentic, locally running tools can also send code to hosted providers; check the selected agent and model configuration.
Cursor vs Claude Code or Codex: what is different?
Cursor includes a full editor. Claude Code and Codex are coding agents with terminal and other interfaces. All have overlapping agent features, so compare the editing experience, account costs and workflow. intentic can run these supported agents rather than forcing you to pick one for every task.
Does Cursor already offer cloud agents and scheduling?
Yes. Cursor offers managed cloud agents, scheduled/event-driven automation and self-hosted workers. intentic is an alternative way to operate a workspace, not the only way to run agents remotely or in parallel. Managed cloud may be preferable if you want less infrastructure work.
Sources and last checked date
Product facts were checked against these official sources on . Prices and features can change. Report a mistake.